Discussion continues as to the better retirement vehicle: a traditional IRA or a Roth IRA. Much of the disagreement centers around future tax rates; will they go up, or will they go down? And, how will changes in the tax code affect IRA’s of either type? Economists can’t seem to agree. The following axiom regarding economists holds true in this situation:
- For every economist’s opinion, there exists an equal and opposite economist’s opinion.
Two Schools of Thought
The adversaries in this discussion fall into two camps: those who believe that you should invest in a Roth IRA because taxes will certainly go up, and those who believe that the future is uncertain, so take what you can get now. Let’s have a look at their arguments.
Taxes Will Go Up, So Invest in a Roth
Proponents of the “taxes will go up” position state that in the future, tax rates will almost certainly go up. Currently, they say, there are multiple financial crises to be concerned with: health care, increased unemployment benefits, hard-hit pension funds, under-funded social security, and an expensive war. Somehow, all of this must be paid for, so it is inevitable that taxes will go up.
If tax rates go up, investors who have contributed funds to a traditional IRA with the hope that their tax rate will be lower when they retire are in for a big disappointment. They may, in fact, be paying more tax on their future withdrawals instead of less tax.
The solution, according to this camp, is to pay the tax on your contributions now while rates are low. Then, when the money is withdrawn, there will then be no tax due at all on the withdrawals. Having a Roth, they say, removes any uncertainly about what future tax rates will be, because there will be no tax on withdrawals at all. With a traditional IRA, you have no choice but to start making withdrawals at age 70 ½ and pay whatever the prevailing tax rate is.
The Future is Uncertain, So Take What You Can Get Today
The proponents of the “uncertain future” position say that knows one knows what the future will bring, so take what you can get today, i.e., an income deduction for your contributions to a regular IRA. The thinking here is similar to the “eat, drink, and be merry, for tomorrow we die” philosophy in its fatalism: the only thing we can be certain about is today.
Income taxes could increase, or not. Capital gains tax could increase, or not. The US could institute a national sales tax, of a VAT tax, or a flat-rate tax. Or not. Who knows? Everyone’s crystal ball seems to be broken.
It’s the uncertainty of future tax policy that prompts this camp to preach in favor of the traditional IRA. Take the tax deduction today. Let tomorrow take care of itself.
The Middle Ground
The truth is that future changes in the tax code could increase or decrease the value of either type of account, say those who assume the middle ground. Middle-of-the-roaders recommend investing in several different retirement vehicles, according to one’s personal circumstances and attitude toward risk.
Who knows what the future will hold? No one, but everyone has an opinion. Just ask any economist.